Found: Black & White English Springer Spaniel Male

Sightings and Information

Please post if you have news about this dog. Log in above or register to leave comments or to like them.
Please note that DogLost cannot be held responsible for the content of any other sites mentioned or linked to here.

2009-02-02 15:31 yewfinder

Hi Springerlover2 I have checked out the picture of Charlie and it is definitely not him sadly.  Thanks for the message. Cheers

Last edited: 2010-05-11 02:17:18

2009-01-29 21:44 springerlover2

  Hi Yewfinder, Put the number into advance search and it comes up there, Charlie B/W springer missing from Ewell I think. Good Luck Lesley

Last edited: 2010-05-11 02:17:18

2009-01-25 17:28 yewfinder

Hi Mizzy I couldn't find the dog number 16665 on the dog lost register.  Where are the details and I will check him out. Cheers

Last edited: 2010-05-11 02:17:18

2009-01-25 17:21 yewfinder

Thanks Springerlover2 - I also work as a receptionist at a vets - snap.  That is how I came to have him, the finder dropped him into us and rather than him go off with the warden, I took him home.  The vets who are listed to have chipped him have looked through their records to no avail but they said they don't put chip numbers on the computer !!  We certainly do, as do you guys. Thanks

Last edited: 2010-05-11 02:17:18

2009-01-21 12:26 springerlover2

  I work as a receptionist in a vets,It would take a while but you can search your client base by breed then locate microchip number from patient screen, thats assuming the vet in question uses computers!!!!!! Have the finders been into the vets themselves, bit of a long shot but as i have a thing about springers i always remember the ones that visit,speak to the nurses also as they help and also give microchips as well . Best of Luck

Last edited: 2010-05-11 02:17:18

2009-01-20 22:48 Furlover - Area Co-ordinator, West Yorkshire

Have checked the main alternative sites but nothing as a match as yet. Perhaps the general free ads /local papers  might be where this one advertised. There are lots of people who dont know of the websites and even some without internet access. I will have a look through these types. I can't believe this one hasnt been reunited yet

Last edited: 2010-05-11 02:17:18

2009-01-20 21:01 mizzy

hi has this one been checked with charlie 16665

Last edited: 2010-05-11 02:17:18

2009-01-20 20:51 noodle

Just a thought, sprockers can look the image for springer spaniels, I should know, I bred a litter and they are the image of springers.

Last edited: 2010-05-11 02:17:18

2009-01-20 14:31 visionvalue

my dog even has a x marks the spot on a diagram of a dog so they can check it against her keepsake number on her collar. Things do get mislaid but it should have been send immediatley to the appropriate centre. Hope this little one is soon claimed.

Last edited: 2010-05-11 02:17:18

2009-01-20 11:10 muns

sorry I meant to post this on BC found on A12 Lowestoft but happily been claimes and reunited nowsilly me!

Last edited: 2010-05-11 02:17:18

2009-01-20 08:43 muns

I am aware the sytem has changed now but in the past Lowestoft Police station had a good reputaton for lost dogs and even had kennels at their station. It may be worth asking if anyone has reported this dog missing to them. Failing that Meadow Green would be where they are taken and an owner may have reported their missing dog there. Have these places been contacted?

Last edited: 2010-05-11 02:17:18

2009-01-20 06:53 DogLostCJ - Police Liaison & SE Regional Coordinator

We have decided to keep this found dog at high profile to assist anyone looking for him,

Last edited: 2010-05-11 02:17:18

2009-01-19 15:15 MicrochipMe

I am a microchipper and do not understand how the vet has mislaid the paperwork.  The microchip should be registered immediately that it has been implanted, either online or by post.  Surely this is just bad management by the vet to have 'mislaid' the paperwork.  Someone somewhere is missing their dog and may not even know of the DogLost website. The problem is that microchips do not get allocated in any particular order but surely records are meant to be kept by whoever implants the chip, then the owner gets a copy and whoever the database is with. OWNERS PLEASE BE AWARE IT IS NOT YOUR JOB TO SEND OFF THE REGISTRATION DETAILS, THAT IS WHAT YOU ARE PAYING THE IMPLANTER TO DO.  

Last edited: 2010-05-11 02:17:18

2009-01-19 10:38 DogLostCJ - Police Liaison & SE Regional Coordinator

Im not sure sure what other sites have been checked. present update is that the dog is being held under the 28 day rule. Although there is a microchip and they have managed to trace the vet where the chip was implanted the vets hold no records . Any paper work seems to have been mislaid in a move of premises and it would appear they did not send any documents on after they did the chip. The finders have now come to a blank wall in tracing the correct owners so im sure any help would be appreciated. Im sure someone of such a lovely dog would want to find them but we cannot seem to find them!!

Last edited: 2010-05-11 02:17:18

2009-01-11 21:17 Furlover - Area Co-ordinator, West Yorkshire

Yewfinder are you also checking other lost dog sites too?. If so, it saves me duplicating,  If not, then I will happily do that also and let you know of any others I come across.

Last edited: 2010-05-11 02:17:18

2009-01-11 17:45 DogLostMajorjet (Jan) - Area Co-ordinator - Liverpool/Merseyside, North West

Thanks furlover for cross checking these ESS. Yewfinder, sorry to have missed you last night and thank you for updating us and the email received today.  If there are any matches we will try and get a photo to send to you.  Jan x We have a photo not for publication by request of finder. if you feel this could be your missing dog please send a photo or full description of your dog to admin@doglost.co.uk quoting ID 16555.  Thanks  

Last edited: 2010-05-11 02:17:18

2009-01-11 16:44 yewfinder

Hi Furlover Thanks for giving me the list of lost Springers on the DL website. I have go through them all and our one is not a match to Twig(16103), Eddie (13082), or Herby (16102) colouring wise.  George (13052) and Archie (11375) are too old.  The only one I can't be certain about is 10430.  I have requested a photo to make sure.  Our dog was chipped but it wasn't registered so that might make a difference. Thanks for your help.  

Last edited: 2010-05-11 02:17:18

2009-01-10 13:21 Furlover - Area Co-ordinator, West Yorkshire

Hi Have done list of missing ones on DL TWIG 16103   (2 1/2 YRS),  SPRINGER PUP STOLEN 10430  ( IN AUGUST 2007  8 WEEKS OLD THEN )      EDDIE 13082 (4 YRS )       ARCHIE 11375 ( 5YRS)  HERBY 16102 (PROBABLY TOO YOUNG FOR A MATCH)  GEORGE 13052 (BUT TOO OLD AT 12 YR)     Will have a look at other sites too     

Last edited: 2010-05-11 02:17:18

2009-01-08 11:14 DogLostReynard

Thanks so much for putting this little chap on....a Photo would be helpful please. I have cross posted to Spaniel forums NESSR and Springthing.3.

Last edited: 2010-05-11 02:17:18